Credit case study preparation

Private Credit Underwriting Test

A private credit underwriting test asks whether you can turn incomplete company information into a disciplined lending recommendation. The model matters, but the decision depends on the quality of earnings, cash conversion, liquidity, structure, documentation, and recovery.

Most tests provide a lender presentation, financial statements, transaction assumptions, or a short data room. Your task is to identify what deserves confidence, what needs adjustment, and what terms would compensate for or control the risk.

What you need to understand

Normalize EBITDA

Separate recurring earnings from aggressive add-backs, unrealized synergies, temporary savings, owner expenses, and acquisition adjustments.

Build cash flow

Bridge EBITDA to free cash flow after taxes, working capital, maintenance capital expenditure, cash interest, leases, and other required payments.

Size and structure debt

Determine revolver needs, funded debt, amortization, maturity, pricing, call protection, covenant levels, and equity contribution.

Write the decision

Summarize the business, transaction, strengths, risks, mitigants, downside, recovery, structure, and final recommendation in a format an investment committee can audit.

Core questions

Questions and answer structure

Question 1

What should the model include?

Use historical and projected income statements, a cash-flow bridge, debt schedule, leverage and coverage calculations, liquidity, base and downside cases, and a recovery analysis. Keep assumptions visible and separate management inputs from your adjustments.

Question 2

How should the downside case be built?

Stress the variables most connected to the business risk: volume, pricing, churn, margin, working capital, capital expenditure, or concentration loss. Do not apply an arbitrary percentage decline to every line. The downside should describe a plausible operating event and its liquidity consequences.

Question 3

How do you recommend covenants?

Start with the risk you need to monitor and the point at which lender intervention remains useful. Set definitions, testing frequency, headroom, step-downs, cure rights, baskets, and reporting requirements that match the operating case and transaction structure.

Question 4

How should recovery be estimated?

Use a stressed enterprise-value multiple, asset realization, or liquidation framework appropriate to the business. Deduct restructuring costs and apply the capital-structure waterfall, including revolver priority, secured claims, guarantees, and other liabilities.

Question 5

What should the final recommendation contain?

State invest or decline, proposed commitment, pricing, structure, key conditions, principal risks, mitigants, downside outcome, and the two or three facts that would change your decision. The recommendation should follow from the analysis rather than repeat it.

Typical process

  1. 01

    Read for risk

    Identify the transaction rationale, borrower quality, key adjustments, liquidity needs, and information gaps before opening the model.

  2. 02

    Build a clean base case

    Normalize historical results, make assumptions explicit, and ensure cash flow connects to the debt schedule.

  3. 03

    Stress and structure

    Run the operating downside, test liquidity and covenant headroom, estimate recovery, and propose lender protections.

  4. 04

    Draft the memo

    Lead with the decision, then support it with concise business, financial, structural, and downside evidence.

Common mistakes

  • Spending the entire test formatting the model
  • Failing to distinguish management assumptions from underwriting assumptions
  • Using EBITDA as cash flow
  • Proposing covenants without definitions or headroom
  • Writing a descriptive memo with no clear recommendation