THE METHOD
How this tool works
Paste the two texts. Simple rules suggest responsibility and qualification lines, then compare a disclosed list of words and aliases. You edit the requirements and make the final assessment; there is no ATS or semantic scoring model.
A shared phrase is a lead to inspect
The checker looks for whole words and listed phrases such as Excel, financial modeling or reconciliation. It shows the supported aliases and possible resume excerpts so you can inspect why a match appeared.
A skills list, a course title and substantial hands-on experience can all contain the same phrase. A negative statement can also contain it. The tool cannot distinguish these automatically, so a detected word never becomes an automatic claim that you meet a requirement.
Use gaps to choose a truthful next action
If you have relevant experience that is unclear on the resume, make the evidence more specific. If you do not have the experience, record the gap or a question for the employer instead of adding an unsupported claim.
Review years of experience, level of responsibility, credentials, location and eligibility yourself. Suggested requirement lines may need editing, and the supported term list is deliberately limited. Add any important requirement that the extraction missed.
WORKED EXAMPLE
Excel appears; SQL still needs a review
For a requirement mentioning Excel and SQL, a resume line about an Excel reporting project creates an Excel signal. It does not establish SQL experience. Record the actual project evidence and decide whether SQL is a genuine gap or experience that has not yet been described.
Assumptions and limits
- The tool compares pasted text, not files or a live job-posting URL.
- It uses a fixed disclosed term list with whole-word and phrase matches, not semantic interpretation.
- Automatic extraction suggests up to 20 lines; you can edit, remove or add up to 30 review items.
- Manual assessments belong to you. No ATS pass score, applicant ranking or interview probability is calculated.
Common questions
Why is there no ATS match percentage?
This tool does not know an employer’s screening rules. A percentage would imply certainty the method does not provide. Instead it shows the detected wording, possible evidence and your own review for each requirement.
Does a missing term mean I am unqualified?
No. Your experience may use different language or fall outside the supported term list. Review the requirement manually and add a relevant example if you have one. Do not add a skill solely to satisfy a keyword check.
Can I correct the extracted requirements?
Yes. Edit the suggested lines, remove irrelevant ones and add missing requirements. Your evidence and assessments are saved locally. Re-extraction requires confirmation because it replaces that manual work.
Sources and methodology
Reviewed November 6, 2026. Sources support the method described above. Examples are illustrative; results depend on your inputs and require your review.