Corporate finance
Prepare for short-term liquidity forecasting questions with an original cash roll-forward and first-exception memo, a worked case, assumptions and evidence checks.
01 / UNDERSTAND THE CONTEXT
A short-term cash forecast is about the sequence and reliability of receipts and payments. This guide focuses on the first exception and how to investigate it. It does not prescribe a restructuring action or treat a forecast as verified cash.
The preparation question is: when does cash first fall below the assumed floor, and which evidence supports the forecast? Use the job description and your actual responsibility to choose what to practice. The worked article supplies an inspectable artifact; this landing page connects it to preparation, application evidence and a next-resource decision.
All numerical scenarios are original fictional exercises. They are not employer question banks, client results, verified market data or a guarantee of hiring. Separate a case calculation from a conclusion that requires contracts, current records or an authorized decision.
Choose evidence that fits the actual mandate, rather than a generic list of finance keywords.
A short-term cash forecast is about the sequence and reliability of receipts and payments. This guide focuses on the first exception and how to investigate it. It does not prescribe a restructuring action or treat a forecast as verified cash.
Each following week begins with the previous ending balance. Receipts and disbursements should have an evidence date and owner. A positive total across thirteen weeks can hide an earlier inability to make a payment.
Create a weekly roll-forward, source notes and an exception list. Distinguish a permitted planning scenario from a decision requiring authorized operating, financing or legal review.
02 / BUILD YOUR APPROACH
Build a cash roll-forward and first-exception memo and test whether another reader can reproduce your explanation.
When does cash first fall below the assumed floor, and which evidence supports the forecast? List the given quantities, dates and definitions before introducing an assumption.
Week-one closing cash is 2 + 1 − 2.5 = 0.5 million. Relative to the supplied 0.8 floor, the gap is 0.3. The floor is a fictional planning assumption, not a legal or regulatory minimum.
If 0.4 million of expected receipts moves into week two, week-one closing cash falls to 0.1 and the floor gap becomes 0.7. Carry that timing change forward; do not simply delete the receipt.
Averaging weekly cash, netting an uncertain receipt with a committed payment or assuming every creditor will defer payment changes the evidence.
Create a weekly roll-forward, source notes and an exception list. Distinguish a permitted planning scenario from a decision requiring authorized operating, financing or legal review. Identify the source, owner and next evidence request; do not invent authority.
03 / SEE IT IN PRACTICE
The purpose is to make the reasoning inspectable, not to imply professional execution or a verified result.
Case or question
Week-one closing cash is 2 + 1 − 2.5 = 0.5 million. Relative to the supplied 0.8 floor, the gap is 0.3. The floor is a fictional planning assumption, not a legal or regulatory minimum.
A defensible explanation
Each following week begins with the previous ending balance. Receipts and disbursements should have an evidence date and owner. A positive total across thirteen weeks can hide an earlier inability to make a payment.
The weak inference
Averaging weekly cash, netting an uncertain receipt with a committed payment or assuming every creditor will defer payment changes the evidence.
Case or question
If 0.4 million of expected receipts moves into week two, week-one closing cash falls to 0.1 and the floor gap becomes 0.7. Carry that timing change forward; do not simply delete the receipt.
A defensible explanation
Create a weekly roll-forward, source notes and an exception list. Distinguish a permitted planning scenario from a decision requiring authorized operating, financing or legal review.
The weak inference
Treating a scenario as an observed outcome or suppressing its assumptions makes the comparison unreliable.
Case or question
Use a cash roll-forward and first-exception memo as a clearly labeled educational or professional work description, depending on what you actually did.
A defensible explanation
State your contribution, the data or facts you were permitted to use, the method and the boundary of your responsibility. A project should remain labeled as a project.
The weak inference
Presenting the fictional case as a client assignment, realized investment result or employer decision invents proof.
A concise answer can still preserve its definitions and uncertainty.
Use support for a named gap
The existing hub supplies preparation context; it is not legal or restructuring advice. Start with the free case and determine whether the gap is analysis, explanation or application positioning.
Any current price and included work belong to the existing destination; this guide introduces no new product, price or service capacity.
Each following week begins with the previous ending balance. Receipts and disbursements should have an evidence date and owner. A positive total across thirteen weeks can hide an earlier inability to make a payment.
If 0.4 million of expected receipts moves into week two, week-one closing cash falls to 0.1 and the floor gap becomes 0.7. Carry that timing change forward; do not simply delete the receipt. Explain the change and the information still missing.
The existing hub supplies preparation context; it is not legal or restructuring advice. The fictional exercise does not establish employer requirements, professional authority, realized performance or a hiring outcome.
Complete a cash roll-forward and first-exception memo, answer the follow-up and decide which evidence is still missing.
The main technical interview hub for accounting, valuation, DCF, M&A, and LBO prep.
How to answer accretion dilution interview questions in investment banking. Learn the mechanics, what actually drives EPS accretion, and the follow-ups interviewers use to separate real understanding from memorization.
Why precedent multiples are higher than trading comps, when to use each method, and how to answer the 5 most common follow-up questions in IB interviews.
How to learn DCF for investment banking interviews in the right order. Master the forecast, unlevered free cash flow, WACC, terminal value, and the common traps that make candidates sound memorized.
Enterprise value vs equity value explained for investment banking interviews. Learn the bridge, the multiples logic, and the follow-up questions candidates routinely miss.
How to answer WACC interview questions in investment banking. Understand what WACC means, how it is built, what changes it, and the follow-ups interviewers use to expose memorized candidates.
The merger model interview questions candidates get in investment banking interviews. Learn the concepts behind pro forma EPS, synergies, purchase accounting, and the follow-up questions that usually decide the round.
The characteristics of a good LBO candidate explained for investment banking and private equity interviews. Learn the logic behind stable cash flow, low capex, margin upside, and other common answers.
How to walk through the three financial statements in an investment banking interview. Learn the simple structure, how the statements link, and the follow-ups candidates most often miss.
The most frequently asked technical questions in IB interviews, accounting, valuation, DCF, M&A, and LBO, with concise answers that demonstrate real competence.
Accounting → Valuation → DCF → M&A → LBO: why sequence matters more than study time.
Practice a concise DCF interview answer, then explain the assumptions behind cash flow, WACC, terminal value and the enterprise-to-equity bridge.